<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EDGE 45mm Clincher Wheels on DT Swiss 190 hubs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cyclingtechblog.com/2009/02/09/edge-45mm-clincher-wheels-on-dt-swiss-190-hubs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cyclingtechblog.com/2009/02/09/edge-45mm-clincher-wheels-on-dt-swiss-190-hubs/</link>
	<description>Fun, exotic, high performance, lightweight, aerodynamic, geeky bike stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun,  5 Sep 2010 21:54:34 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nico</title>
		<link>http://www.cyclingtechblog.com/2009/02/09/edge-45mm-clincher-wheels-on-dt-swiss-190-hubs/comment-page-1/#comment-1876</link>
		<dc:creator>Nico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyclingtechblog.com/?p=119#comment-1876</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
Whats your take on the edge rims quality compaired to the reynolds?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

We sell both Reynolds and EDGE rims, but we have much more experience with EDGE. To be totally honest, I think the quality is the same, at least when I&#039;m comparing the Reynolds DV46 UL with the EDGE 1.45. These are both tubulars and I know you&#039;re asking about clinchers, so this is just a remark on the quality of both. Reynolds originally claimed that the DV46 UL tubular would weigh 250 grams, which is crazy light, but I believe they were having problems with those super-light rims and they beefed them up to around 300 grams. EDGE claimed 280 grams for the 1.45, but those also seem to come in right around 300 grams. When I hold these two rims side-by-side, and when I put them on a scale, they really seem very similar to me; they are both beautiful, light, and well made.

We have EDGE 45mm clincher rims in stock, and those are also gorgeous rims. We don&#039;t have any Reynolds clincher rims in stock, but the ones I&#039;ve seen look very similar. 

Sorry for the wishy-washy answer, but I don&#039;t have a strong opinion on one being better than the other. The one thing I will say is that Reynolds is often way behind in fulfilling orders and it can take a long time to get their stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Whats your take on the edge rims quality compaired to the reynolds?
</p></blockquote>
<p>We sell both Reynolds and EDGE rims, but we have much more experience with EDGE. To be totally honest, I think the quality is the same, at least when I&#8217;m comparing the Reynolds DV46 UL with the EDGE 1.45. These are both tubulars and I know you&#8217;re asking about clinchers, so this is just a remark on the quality of both. Reynolds originally claimed that the DV46 UL tubular would weigh 250 grams, which is crazy light, but I believe they were having problems with those super-light rims and they beefed them up to around 300 grams. EDGE claimed 280 grams for the 1.45, but those also seem to come in right around 300 grams. When I hold these two rims side-by-side, and when I put them on a scale, they really seem very similar to me; they are both beautiful, light, and well made.</p>
<p>We have EDGE 45mm clincher rims in stock, and those are also gorgeous rims. We don&#8217;t have any Reynolds clincher rims in stock, but the ones I&#8217;ve seen look very similar. </p>
<p>Sorry for the wishy-washy answer, but I don&#8217;t have a strong opinion on one being better than the other. The one thing I will say is that Reynolds is often way behind in fulfilling orders and it can take a long time to get their stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert</title>
		<link>http://www.cyclingtechblog.com/2009/02/09/edge-45mm-clincher-wheels-on-dt-swiss-190-hubs/comment-page-1/#comment-1875</link>
		<dc:creator>robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 01:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyclingtechblog.com/?p=119#comment-1875</guid>
		<description>hi.
I wonder about th equality of edge 45 clincher carbons.

I melted some zipp 303 about 5 years ago. Have other zipp that bulged. Have a pair of corima that bulged and stress cracked.

Also had a pair of reynolds KOM they seemed good and have a good rep for high quality.

If I get carbon clinchers I look for high quality of the rim first. Then performance.  

Whats your take on the edge rims quality compaired to the reynolds?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi.<br />
I wonder about th equality of edge 45 clincher carbons.</p>
<p>I melted some zipp 303 about 5 years ago. Have other zipp that bulged. Have a pair of corima that bulged and stress cracked.</p>
<p>Also had a pair of reynolds KOM they seemed good and have a good rep for high quality.</p>
<p>If I get carbon clinchers I look for high quality of the rim first. Then performance.  </p>
<p>Whats your take on the edge rims quality compaired to the reynolds?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
