<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Cycling Technology Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cyclingtechblog.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cyclingtechblog.com</link>
	<description>Fun, exotic, high performance, lightweight, aerodynamic, geeky bike stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on World&#8217;s most aero UCI legal bars? by rusty at feepish</title>
		<link>http://www.cyclingtechblog.com/2010/02/24/worlds-most-aero-uci-legal-bars/comment-page-1/#comment-2250</link>
		<dc:creator>rusty at feepish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 15:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyclingtechblog.com/?p=273#comment-2250</guid>
		<description>the uscf has a minimum width for brake hoods.

pretty specifically does not apply to your bars. because they aren't used in a road event and because of the lack of hoods.

1M1d

...attachments that point upward on the brakehoods of road bicycles are allowed if the distance between them is greater than 25 cm...

nice bars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the uscf has a minimum width for brake hoods.</p>
<p>pretty specifically does not apply to your bars. because they aren&#8217;t used in a road event and because of the lack of hoods.</p>
<p>1M1d</p>
<p>&#8230;attachments that point upward on the brakehoods of road bicycles are allowed if the distance between them is greater than 25 cm&#8230;</p>
<p>nice bars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on World&#8217;s most aero UCI legal bars? by Francis</title>
		<link>http://www.cyclingtechblog.com/2010/02/24/worlds-most-aero-uci-legal-bars/comment-page-1/#comment-2240</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyclingtechblog.com/?p=273#comment-2240</guid>
		<description>Awesome project !  


---Francis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome project !  </p>
<p>&#8212;Francis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on World&#8217;s most aero UCI legal bars? by Mike Creed</title>
		<link>http://www.cyclingtechblog.com/2010/02/24/worlds-most-aero-uci-legal-bars/comment-page-1/#comment-2239</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Creed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyclingtechblog.com/?p=273#comment-2239</guid>
		<description>I'd love to get a pair made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to get a pair made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on World&#8217;s most aero UCI legal bars? by Nico</title>
		<link>http://www.cyclingtechblog.com/2010/02/24/worlds-most-aero-uci-legal-bars/comment-page-1/#comment-2238</link>
		<dc:creator>Nico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyclingtechblog.com/?p=273#comment-2238</guid>
		<description>I sure hope these don't bring about an early funeral! These are prototype bars -- I'm definitely going to test them out and make sure I feel safe with them before I go do a technical TT course. And it's possible that I'll decide they are too narrow, and I'll either make a wider set, or I'll reserve them for non-technical races. But from my previous experience, having really narrow bars doesn't make handling the bike difficult, rather it makes riding out of the saddle difficult. Until I get out on the road with these, I'm just speculating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sure hope these don&#8217;t bring about an early funeral! These are prototype bars &#8212; I&#8217;m definitely going to test them out and make sure I feel safe with them before I go do a technical TT course. And it&#8217;s possible that I&#8217;ll decide they are too narrow, and I&#8217;ll either make a wider set, or I&#8217;ll reserve them for non-technical races. But from my previous experience, having really narrow bars doesn&#8217;t make handling the bike difficult, rather it makes riding out of the saddle difficult. Until I get out on the road with these, I&#8217;m just speculating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on World&#8217;s most aero UCI legal bars? by jorj</title>
		<link>http://www.cyclingtechblog.com/2010/02/24/worlds-most-aero-uci-legal-bars/comment-page-1/#comment-2237</link>
		<dc:creator>jorj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyclingtechblog.com/?p=273#comment-2237</guid>
		<description>Indeed, I googled it after I said that too. UK CTT regulation is 35cm, but the UCI don't seem to be specific. I wouldn't fancy 28cm if there is any technical riding to do, but hey, it's your funeral :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, I googled it after I said that too. UK CTT regulation is 35cm, but the UCI don&#8217;t seem to be specific. I wouldn&#8217;t fancy 28cm if there is any technical riding to do, but hey, it&#8217;s your funeral <img src='http://www.cyclingtechblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on World&#8217;s most aero UCI legal bars? by djconnel</title>
		<link>http://www.cyclingtechblog.com/2010/02/24/worlds-most-aero-uci-legal-bars/comment-page-1/#comment-2236</link>
		<dc:creator>djconnel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyclingtechblog.com/?p=273#comment-2236</guid>
		<description>I checked both UCI and USAC rules, and could find no explicit minimum width (only a maximum, which isn't an issue).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I checked both UCI and USAC rules, and could find no explicit minimum width (only a maximum, which isn&#8217;t an issue).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on World&#8217;s most aero UCI legal bars? by Nico</title>
		<link>http://www.cyclingtechblog.com/2010/02/24/worlds-most-aero-uci-legal-bars/comment-page-1/#comment-2235</link>
		<dc:creator>Nico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyclingtechblog.com/?p=273#comment-2235</guid>
		<description>I thought that might be true, but I Googled it and everything I found was like this:
http://www.fixedgearfever.com/modules.php?name=Forums&#38;file=./viewtopic&#38;t=3378</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought that might be true, but I Googled it and everything I found was like this:<br />
<a href="http://www.fixedgearfever.com/modules.php?name=Forums&amp;file=./viewtopic&amp;t=3378" rel="nofollow">http://www.fixedgearfever.com/modules.php?name=Forums&amp;file=./viewtopic&amp;t=3378</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on World&#8217;s most aero UCI legal bars? by jorj</title>
		<link>http://www.cyclingtechblog.com/2010/02/24/worlds-most-aero-uci-legal-bars/comment-page-1/#comment-2232</link>
		<dc:creator>jorj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyclingtechblog.com/?p=273#comment-2232</guid>
		<description>Check the UCI regulations carefully: I think there is already a specified minimum handlebar width of around 35cm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check the UCI regulations carefully: I think there is already a specified minimum handlebar width of around 35cm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wind tunnel testing with John Cobb at Texas A&#038;M by World&#8217;s most aero UCI legal bars? - Cycling Technology Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.cyclingtechblog.com/2009/11/25/wind-tunnel-testing-with-john-cobb-at-texas-am/comment-page-1/#comment-2231</link>
		<dc:creator>World&#8217;s most aero UCI legal bars? - Cycling Technology Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyclingtechblog.com/?p=235#comment-2231</guid>
		<description>[...] Cobb&#8217;s new wind tunnel optimized position for me has my arm rests 5cm lower than my 3T Ventus bars, and has my elbows much closer to each other. My [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cobb&#8217;s new wind tunnel optimized position for me has my arm rests 5cm lower than my 3T Ventus bars, and has my elbows much closer to each other. My [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Lightest Wheels in the World? 715 grams! by mersmak efter helgen &#171; jonas viktiga blogg</title>
		<link>http://www.cyclingtechblog.com/2009/03/03/new-lightest-wheels-in-the-world-715-grams/comment-page-1/#comment-2230</link>
		<dc:creator>mersmak efter helgen &#171; jonas viktiga blogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyclingtechblog.com/?p=147#comment-2230</guid>
		<description>[...] ni vill se hur lätt man kan bygga kan ni kolla in detta hjulbygget. 715g (ca pris $2500) och ändå inte lättast då Lew har byggt ett par customhjul på 704g, pris [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ni vill se hur lätt man kan bygga kan ni kolla in detta hjulbygget. 715g (ca pris $2500) och ändå inte lättast då Lew har byggt ett par customhjul på 704g, pris [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
